Jalen Brunson And The Knicks Laid A Blueprint For The Rest Of The NBA

How Brunson Helped Build The Knicks

The Knicks have the league’s second-highest payroll this year. They finished less than $250,000 below the second apron this season and exactly $53,349 below it last year.

Brunson’s contract was the key to that.

Teams that go over the first apron—which the Knicks have soared above in each of the past two seasons—can’t take back more salary than they send out via trade, can’t acquire players via sign-and-trade and can’t sign someone on the buyout market who was previously earning more than the non-taxpayer mid-level exception, among other restrictions.

Teams that go above the second apron have their hands tied even more. Beyond all of the first-apron restrictions, second-apron teams also can’t aggregate two or more smaller contracts to acquire a bigger salary. They also lose access to the taxpayer MLE in free agency and can’t trade their first-round pick seven years in the future.

Since the Knicks stayed under the second apron in 2024-25, they were allowed to aggregate contracts to acquire both Mikal Bridges and Karl-Anthony Towns via trade. Since they stayed under it this season as well, they had access to the taxpayer MLE, which they used to sign Guerschon Yabusele to a two-year, $12 million contract in free agency.

Yabusele didn’t work out as hoped for the Knicks, but he wasn’t a total loss for them. They wound up flipping him for Dalen Terry, whom they quickly dealt for Game 1 hero Jose Alvarado ahead of the February trade deadline.

Had Brunson been on a market-value contract, the Knicks would have been over the second apron each of the past two years, barring other moves. They wouldn’t have been able to aggregate contracts for Bridges or Towns, nor would they have had the taxpayer MLE this past offseason.

Unlike other teams around the league, the Knicks are willing to spend deep into the luxury tax under the right circumstances. But the latest CBA does impose draconian roster-building restrictions for teams that cross either of the aprons.

Brunson’s current contract is the Knicks’ way around that.

“Their ability to keep the team together, and add to it, is less a question of dollars and more about flexibility under the NBA’s newish apron rules,” ESPN’s Brian Windhorst wrote during last year’s Eastern Conference Finals between the Knicks and Indiana Pacers. “And this is why there is a belief across the league that New York is just opening its own pathway, perhaps right alongside Indiana.

“At the heart of why is star Jalen Brunson’s four-year, $156 million contract extension.”

Will Other Stars Follow Suit?

We’re now three full seasons into this CBA. Players, front office executives and owners alike have seen how difficult it is to build teams around three max contracts unless you’re the Oklahoma City Thunder. (And even they have tough financial decisions to make this offseason now that Chet Holmgren and Jalen Williams are no longer on rookie-scale deals.)

This CBA effectively gives star players a binary choice: Do you want to maximize your earning potential or your championship equity? You can’t have it both ways anymore.

Paul George chose the former when he signed a four-year, $211.6 million deal with the Philadelphia 76ers in free agency two years ago. He has exactly four playoff wins to show for it. Brunson and the Knicks are three wins away from winning four playoff series this year alone.

Some older stars, such as Kyrie Irving and James Harden, have begun to take below-max deals in recent years. That’s largely a byproduct of their age and other circumstances, though. In-their-prime stars—and even a few past-their prime stars such as George—are still routinely getting full max deals.

Now that Brunson’s sacrifice has paid off in a Finals run, will other stars look to emulate that strategy?

Based on the current $165 million projection for the 2026-27 salary cap, a five-year, 25% max deal would be worth $239.25 million, a 30% max deal would be $287.1 million and a 35% max deal would be $334.95 million. Agents and income taxes (in most states) would wipe out a not-insignificant chunk of that, but it’s generational wealth either way.

If someone eligible for a 35% max took closer to a 25% max, he’d be freeing up more than $16 million in financial flexibility for his team this coming season. For context, the non-taxpayer mid-level exception is projected to be just over $15 million.

If multiple stars agreed to take similar discounts, that could give one lucky team the flexibility to build around a Big Three without running into major apron issues. It’d be what Brunson’s contract did to the Knicks but on steroids.

The NBA’s financial system is effectively designed to prevent superteams. It’s now harder to build around multiple players on max contracts, and under the recently passed draft-lottery reform, teams can no longer have three straight picks land in the top five of the draft. They’re automatically moved to No. 6 or lower in their third year.

Brunson and the Knicks are proving how beneficial one discount contract can be in overcoming the second-apron restrictions. If two or more stars agreed to team up on well-below-max deals, they could quickly become the team to beat in the NBA thanks to the flexibility their front office would have to build around them.

Unless otherwise noted, all stats via NBA.com, PBPStats, Cleaning the Glass or Basketball Reference. All salary information via Spotrac and salary-cap information via RealGM. All odds via FanDuel Sportsbook.

Follow Bryan on Bluesky.